Economic Growth And Social Inclusion – Improving the fatigue design of mechanical systems such as food storage refrigeration in the agricultural industry in a circular economy.
Center for Open Access Policy Guidelines Special Issue Guidelines Research Ethical Procedures and Research Ethics Article Preparation Fee Awards Descriptions
Economic Growth And Social Inclusion
All published articles are available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reproduce all or part of the article, including figures and tables. For articles published under the Open Access Creative Commons CC BY License, any part of the article may be reused without permission unless permission from the original article is expressly stated. For more information, please visit https:///openaccess.
Community Economic Development: Localisation, The Key To A Resilient And Inclusive Local Economy?
Submitted papers represent high-quality research that has the potential to have a significant impact on the field. Featured papers should be key articles that cover multiple techniques or methods, provide insight into future research directions, and describe applicable research methods.
Submitted papers are submitted by scientific editors by invitation or individual recommendation and must receive positive feedback from reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations from scientific journal editors from around the world. The editors select a small number of recently published articles in the journal that they believe will be of particular interest to readers, or relevant to a related area of research. The aim is to provide an overview of the most interesting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
By Xinjie Yan Xinjie Yan Scilit Preprints.org Google Scholar See Publications 1, 2, Hui Sun Hui Sun Scilit Preprints.org Google Scholar See Publications 1, 2, * and longer
Social Inclusion: Context, Theory And Practice
Received: 22 February 2023 / Revised: 11 April 2023 / Accepted: 19 April 2023 / Published: 21 April 2023
To better address the gaps and differences arising from the single path of low carbon development, we need to review the paths of low carbon development (ILCD), and coordinate the low carbon policies (LCP) within the ILCD. .plays an important role. This paper has manually collected LCP data from 30 provinces in China from 2010 to 2019 and conducted research to measure LCP topic composition, LCP tool compatibility, and general LCP compatibility using text analysis. . At the same time, an ILCD indicator analysis framework was developed to measure the effectiveness of ILCD at the provincial level using the most effective SBM model. Therefore, the synergistic effect of LCP on ILCD area was investigated to show its performance, and its differences were investigated. The results of the research show the following: (1) In general, LCP subject coordination, LCP instrument coordination and LCP overall coordination are effective in improving regional ILCD. (2) LCP subject synchronization and LCP device synchronization are mandatory. Policy consistency can only have a positive effect on ILCD when policy issues and policy instruments are highly consistent, while ILCD will be very weak when policy issues and policy instruments are inconsistent. (3) The stronger the output power, the stronger the input of the LCP configuration to the ILCD. (4) In non-resource-based areas, the effect of LCP subject compatibility on regional ILCD is significant, and the effect of LCP device compatibility is insignificant, while in resource-based areas it is the opposite. This study is an important reference for the government to improve the coordination of the LCP and promote regional ILCD.
Combating climate change is an important issue in the world today . Since the beginning of low carbon development, many countries have actively sought effective ways to balance climate control and economic growth. Major countries around the world have announced high carbon targets or carbon neutral targets , and various LCPs aim to promote low-carbon industrial transition, achieve sustainable economic development, and promote harmonious social development . However, at the national level, each country is at a different level of development, with great differences between countries in terms of economic development, resource availability, environmental conditions, and political systems . A global approach to low-carbon development ignores the challenges and difficulties countries face in meeting climate change goals, which can increase global inequality, slow down drivers of local economic development, and prevent sustainable and long-term global greening. -time of climate change. Management . At the industrial level, low-carbon development means that the energy mix must change from fossil energy to environmentally friendly energy, which will have a negative impact on traditional labor-intensive industries, causing unemployment, health and safety problems. widening the gap between the rich and the poor and hindering inclusive growth [6, 7]. At the regional level, many regions have succeeded in increasing economic growth by doubling carbon emissions and leading the way in achieving high levels of carbon, while other provinces are still in the process of reducing carbon and Transport is in a state of stagnation and stagnation. an unpleasant situation. A lot of stress. Many local governments are unable to coordinate policies when faced with obstacles to economic growth and reducing carbon emissions and thus adopt LCPs that are “equal to all”, which are conducive to sustainable economic growth and social development. . At the business level, some businesses, especially micro and small businesses, are unable to withstand the risks in the low carbon development process due to the weakness of capital, limited resources and insufficient capacity to innovate, and the “crowding” effect. to go. “And the cost implications of saving energy and reducing carbon” bring serious challenges to their health and development . At the residential level, people’s participation in low-carbon management and willingness to live a low-carbon life still have a lot of room for improvement, and the costs of low-carbon management are often passed on to consumers through taxes or high production prices. transferred. As a result, society is not a direct beneficiary of low-carbon development. Therefore, the global climate management paradigm should promote a shift to the low-carbon development paradigm, fully consider the diversity and inclusion of low-carbon development strategies, and actively explore the ILCD model.
As a comprehensive goal, the ILCD requires a comprehensive coordination between different things and subjects in society, where the LCP of the government plays an important role of a large organization, especially in many areas, which is chosen by the government. LCP is a consistent and comprehensive application. Key factors in ILCD performance. Currently, China is the largest carbon emitter, and the Chinese government takes its global responsibility to prevent climate change, widely implement various LCPs, and produce low-carbon products. In , important results were obtained. However, in fact, there are still many obstacles to the coordination of the LCP in China: First, the inconsistency of the LCP and the conflicts cause the ILCD to “operate independently”. For example, after the central government announced the ‘3060’ carbon target in 2020, some local governments have adopted the “Square Carbon Campaign” and “one-size-fits-all” policies to complete their carbon reduction activities. it is not always the case. correct or correct. For example, energy conservation and reduction of emissions targets issued by different departments are not compatible with the performance of thermal power and steel industries . Second, the redundancy and singularity of LCP devices leads to a lack of effective ILCD. The widespread use of targeting instruments by governments to promote low-carbon development is a way of multiplying resources, bad marketing and policy tools, which reduces social participation and equal opportunities, creating a lack of coordination. and the link between low-carbon development and inclusive growth , resulting in low ILCD performance. The problems mentioned above lead to the lack of a clear LCP as the basis of the local ILCD, which leads to long-term mechanical inefficiency and thus prevents changes in results. The report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China proposed to promote carbon neutrality actively and continuously, requiring the government to strengthen communication and coordination between various departments, improve the quality of the LCP, and at the same time enrich policy instruments. . and selecting resource allocations to maximize LCP’s impact on the world.
Detroit Regional Partnership Receives Two Iedc Excellence In Economic Development Awards
Most of the existing research on LCPs takes one or more LCPs to be independent and evaluates the effectiveness of certain types of LCPs, such as command and control, market regulation, public participation, etc. Other scholars study the role of policy coordination. Regional development from the level of evaluation of the impact of a major policy. However, there are still many areas that need further development. On the other hand, the existing research to measure the coordination of the LCP is one thing, mainly aimed at combining several LCPs to see the impact of their policy, and this is seen from the perspective of the analysis of the text of the LCP in the policy topics and instruments. microscopic picture. . On the other hand, existing research on ILCD is mainly focused on developing test reference systems, and there is still room for further enrichment of ILCP measurements. At the same time, the existing research on factors influencing ILCP is still weak, and LCP and its co-factors are neglected as the main factors affecting ILCD. Several studies have systematically discussed the mechanism of influence of LCP composition on ILCD.
Economic growth and sustainability, economic growth and development, financial inclusion and economic growth, education and economic growth, trade and economic growth, social economic growth, inflation and economic growth, gdp and economic growth, economic growth and technology, social justice and inclusion, disability and social inclusion, innovation and economic growth